-
×
Color: Onbekend
Pedigree Number: DZB
Junker Abel v. Thüringen is a Doberman Pinscher born .
If you have more information about Junker Abel v. Thüringen and would like to submit more information about this animal please feel contact us.
If you own Junker Abel v. Thüringen and would like to claim its ownership contact us.
If we have information about its ancestry and health you should be able to find it on this page.
If you like to help with animal welfare , please consider joining our system and contribute to our goal.
Name | Sex | Relationship | Father | Mother | Birth | Death | Life Span | Cause Of Death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wally v. Burgwall Herlsleben | Female | Sister | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Susei v. Krugental | ||||
Wilma v. Thüringen (DZB 417) | Female | Sister | Hiskias v. Thüringen | Irmgart v. Thüringen | ||||
Arno v. Hermannstein | Male | Brother | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Lotti v. Hermannstein | ||||
Kniff v. Thüringen | Male | Brother | Hannibal v. Thüringen | Irmgart v. Thüringen | ||||
Waldo v. Thüringen | Male | Brother | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Cordula v. Thüringen | ||||
Tauentziens Muck | Male | Brother | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Tauentziens Bella | ||||
Claudius v. Thüringen | Male | Brother | Nikodemus v. Thüringen | Irmgart v. Thüringen | ||||
Prinz Hunolf v. Wasserburg | Male | Brother | Hellegraf v. Thüringen (DZB 172) | Irmgart v. Thüringen | ||||
Freya v. Rhein | Female | Sister | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Trudchen v. Rosenheim | ||||
Nelly v. Hörnsheim (DZB not reg.Nicodemus x Flora) | Female | Sister | Nicodemus v. Thüringen | Flora v. Hörnsheim |
Name | Sex | Relationship | Father | Mother | Birth | Death | Life Span | Cause Of Death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lotte v. Huy | Female | Progeny | Junker Abel v. Thüringen | Prinzess Bella v. Hagen | ||||
Bella (DZB not reg. Junker Abel x Prinzess Bella) | Female | Progeny | Junker Abel v. Thüringen | Prinzess Bella v. Hagen | ||||
Jack v. Hagen | Male | Progeny | Junker Abel v. Thüringen | Prinzess Bella v. Hagen |